Vioxx Drug Lawyer

What is Vioxx (Rofecoxib)?

Rofecoxib is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) that was used in the treatment of osteoarthritis, acute pain conditions, and dysmenorrhoea. Formerly marketed by Merck & Co. under the trade names Vioxx, Ceoxx and Ceeoxx, it was voluntarily withdrawn from the market in 2004 because of concerns about increased risk of heart attack and stroke.


Rofecoxib was one of the most widely used drugs ever to be withdrawn from the market. Worldwide, over two million people were prescribed Vioxx at the time.


In the year before withdrawal, Merck had a sales revenue of US$2.5 billion from Vioxx. Rofecoxib was available on prescription as tablets and as an oral suspension.


Get legal help on all Vioxxx related issue in less than $1 per day with us. Our expert attorneys are well versed in the field of law and are known for fast disposal of cases. To get legal services of our reputed attorneys, just fill up our online confidential legal form.


Vioxx is in a class of drugs called nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Vioxx works by reducing substances that cause inflammation, pain, and fever in the body. Vioxx is used to reduce pain, inflammation, and stiffness caused by osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis and certain forms of juvenile rheumatoid arthritis; to manage acute pain in adults; to treat migraines; and to treat menstrual pain.


The manufacturer of Vioxx has announced a voluntary withdrawal of the drug from the U.S. and worldwide market. This withdrawal is due to safety concerns of an increased risk of cardiovascular events (including heart attack and stroke) in patients taking Vioxx.


Notify your doctor immediately if you develop abdominal pain, tenderness, or discomfort; nausea; blood in your vomit; bloody, black, or tarry stools; unexplained weight gain; swelling or water retention; fatigue or lethargy; a skin rash; itching; yellowing of your skin or eyes;”flu-like” symptoms; or unusual bruising or bleeding. These symptoms could be early signs of dangerous side effects.


If you experience any of the following serious side effects, stop taking Vioxx and seek medical treatment or contact your doctor immediately:

  • an allergic reaction (difficulty breathing; closing of your throat; swelling of your lips, tongue, or face; or hives);
  • abdominal pain, tenderness, or discomfort;
  • bloody, black, or tarry stools;
  • nausea or heartburn;
  • blood in your vomit;
  • unexplained weight gain;
  • swelling or water retention;
  • unusual fatigue or lethargy;
  • a skin rash or itching;
  • yellowing of your skin or eyes;
  • “flu-like” symptoms; or
  • unusual bruising or bleeding.
criminal attorney
criminal law attorney
criminal case attorney
case study attorney

Vioxx, Adverse Drug Reactions

Aside from the reduced incidence of gastric ulceration, rofecoxib exhibits a similar adverse effect profile to other NSAIDs.


Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, usually abbreviated to NSAIDs, are drugs with analgesic, antipyretic and Anti-Inflammatory Effects – they reduce pain, fever and inflammation. The term “non-steroidal” is used to distinguish these drugs from steroids, which (amongst a broad range of other effects) have a similar eicosanoid depressing anti-inflammatory action. NSAIDs are sometimes also referred to as non-steroidal anti-inflammatoryagents/analgesics (NSAIAs). The most prominent members of this group of drugs are aspirin and ibuprofen. Paracetamol, or acetaminophen, has little anti-inflammatory activity, and is not an NSAID.


Beginning in 1829, with the isolation of salicylic acid from the folk remedy willow bark, NSAIDs have become an important part of the pharmaceutical treatment of pain (at low doses) and inflammation (at higher doses). Part of the popularity of NSAIDs is that, unlike opioids, they do not produce sedation, respiratory depression, or addiction. NSAIDs, however, are not without their own problems (see below). Certain NSAIDs have become accepted as relatively safe, resulting in the rescheduling of these agents, e.g. ibuprofen, to allow availability over-the-counter.

Vioxx, Market Withdrawal

Vigor Study

The VIGOR study, published in 2000, had indicated a significant 4-fold increased risk of acute myocardial infarction (heart attack) in rofecoxib patients when compared with naproxen patients (0.4% vs 0.1%, RR 0.25) over the 12 month span of the study. There was no significant difference in the mortality from cardiovascular events between the two groups.


Nor was there any significant difference in the rate of myocardial infarction between the rofecoxib and naproxen treatment groups in patients without high cardiovascular risk. The difference in overall risk was accounted for by the patients meeting the criteria for low-dose aspirin prophyalxis of secondary cardiovascular events (previous myocardial infarction, angina, cerebrovascular accident, transient ischemic attack, angioplasty, or coronary bypass), but who were excluded from taking low-dose aspirin in the initial design study. Once this risk was noted, Merck notified investigators in other rofecoxib studies to modify allow high-risk patients to take low-dose aspirin. (Bombardier et al., 2000)


Merck’s scientists interpreted the finding as a protective effect of naproxen in reducing the risk of MI in high cardiovascular risk patients by 80 percent (which some commentators have noted would make naproxen three times as effective as aspirin). The results of the VIGOR study were submitted to the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in February 2001, which led to the introduction, in April 2002, of warnings on Vioxx labeling concerning the increased risk of cardiovascular events (heart attack and stroke).


In sum, the VIGOR study suggested that medium-term use of rofecoxib resulted in nearly four-times the risk of suffering a heart attack or stroke in patients already at high risk of adverse cardiovascuar events compared to patients receiving a placebo. There was no difference in risk for patients with normal cardiovascular risk.


Approve Study

In 2001, Merck commenced the APPROVe (Adenomatous Polyp Prevention on Vioxx) study, a three year trial with the primary aim of evaluating the efficacy of rofecoxib for the prophylaxis of colorectal polyps. Celecoxib had already been approved for this indication, and it was hoped to add this to the indications for rofecoxib as well. An additional aim of the study was to further evaluate the cardiovascular safety of rofecoxib.


The APPROVe study was terminated early when the preliminary data from the study showed an increased relative risk of adverse thrombotic cardiovascular events (including heart attack and stroke), beginning after 18 months of rofecoxib therapy. In patients taking rofecoxib, versus placebo, the relative risk of these events was 1.92 (rofecoxib 1.50 events vs placebo 0.78 events per 100 patient years). The results from the first 18 months of the APPROVe study did not show an increased relative risk of adverse cardiovascular events. (Bresalier et al., 2005) Previous Phase III clinical trials had also not shown this trend. (Swan, 2004)



Merck publicly announced the withdrawal of the drug from the market worldwide on September 30, 2004.In addition to its own studies, on September 23, 2004 Merck apparently received information about new research by the FDA that supported previous findings of increased risk of heart attack among rofecoxib users (Grassley, 2004). FDA analysts estimated that Vioxx caused between 88,000 and 139,000 heart attacks, 30 to 40 percent of which were probably fatal, in the five years the drug was on the market.


On November 5 the medical journal The Lancet published a meta-analysis of the available studies on the safety of rofecoxib (Jüni et al., 2004). The authors concluded that, owing to the known cardiovascular risk, rofecoxib should have been withdrawn several years earlier. The Lancet published an editorial which condemned both Merck and the FDA for the continued availability of rofecoxib from 2000 until the recall. Merck responded by issuing a rebuttal of the Jüni et al. meta-analysis (Merck & Co., 2004).


Other COX-2 Inhibitors

It is currently unknown whether the increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events is common to all COX-2 inhibitors. Recent studies have demonstrated the increased risk of cardiovascular events associated with the use of celecoxib, valdecoxib and parecoxib. (Solomon et al., 2005; Nussmeier et al., 2005)


Newer and more specific COX-2 inhibitors, including etoricoxib (Arcoxia) and lumiracoxib (Prexige), are currently undergoing Phase III/IV clinical trials. It is likely that these trials will be extended in order to supply additional evidence of cardiovascular safety.

Vioxx, FDA Health Advisory

Merck & Co., Inc. today announced a voluntary withdrawal of Vioxx from the U.S. market due to safety concerns. Vioxx is a prescription COX-2 selective, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) that was approved by FDA in May 1999 for the relief of the signs and symptoms of osteoarthritis, for the management of acute pain in adults, and for the treatment of menstrual symptoms. It is also approved for the relief of the signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis in adults and children.


The Agency was informed by Merck & Co., Inc. on September 27, 2004, that the Data Safety Monitoring Board for an ongoing long-term study of Vioxx (APPROVe) had recommended that the study be stopped early for safety reasons. The study was being conducted in patients at risk for developing recurrent colon polyps. The study showed an increased risk of cardiovascular events (including heart attack and stroke) in patients on Vioxx compared to placebo, particularly those who had been taking the drug for longer than 18 months. Based on this new safety information, Merck and FDA officials met the next day, September 28, 2004, and during that meeting FDA was informed that Merck was voluntarily withdrawing Vioxx from the market place.


The risk that an individual patient taking Vioxx will suffer a heart attack or stroke related to the drug is very small. Patients who are currently taking Vioxx should contact their physician for guidance regarding discontinuation and alternative therapies.


FDA is working closely with Merck to coordinate the withdrawal of this product from the U.S. market place. Healthcare professionals are advised to contact Merck at 1-888-368-4699 or at or at the FDA’s Drug Information Office at 301-827-4573 or 1-888-463-6332 or go to Vioxx Information on FDA’s website at: for questions about this product.

Find Vioxx Drug Attorney by Location















Kansas City

Las Vegas

Los Angeles





New York

Oklahoma City






St. Louis

San Antonio

San Diego

San Francisco

San Jose



Washington, DC

Find Vioxx Drug Attorney in Top Counties

Alameda County, CA

Bexar County, TX

Broward County,  FL

Cook County, IL

Cuyahoga County, OH

Dallas County, TX

Harris County, TX

King County, WA

Kings/ Brooklyn County, NY

Los Angeles County, CA

Maricopa County, AZ

Miami-Dade County, FL

New York/ Manhattan County, NY

Orange County, CA

Philadelpia County, PA

Queens County, NY

Riverside County, CA

San Bernardino County, CA

San Diego County, CA

Santa Clara County, CA

Suffolk County, NY

Tarrant County, TX

Wayne County, MI

Find Vioxx Drug Attorney in Top Metros

Chicago Metro, IL

Los Angeles-Long Beach Metro, CA

New York Metro, NY

Washington Metro, DC-MD-VA-WV

Find Vioxx Drug Attorney By State









District of Columbia





















New Hampshire

New Jersey

New Mexico

New York

North Carolina

North Dakota





Rhode Island

South Carolina

South Dakota







West Virginia